Enhancing rare variant interpretation in inherited arrhythmias through quantitative analysis of consortium disease cohorts and population controls
Collaborators, Affiliations
- PMID: 32893267
- DOI: 10.1038/s41436-020-00946-5
Abstract
Purpose: Stringent variant interpretation guidelines can lead to high rates of variants of uncertain significance (VUS) for genetically heterogeneous disease like long QT syndrome (LQTS) and Brugada syndrome (BrS). Quantitative and disease-specific customization of American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics/Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG/AMP) guidelines can address this false negative rate.
Methods: We compared rare variant frequencies from 1847 LQTS (KCNQ1/KCNH2/SCN5A) and 3335 BrS (SCN5A) cases from the International LQTS/BrS Genetics Consortia to population-specific gnomAD data and developed disease-specific criteria for ACMG/AMP evidence classes-rarity (PM2/BS1 rules) and case enrichment of individual (PS4) and domain-specific (PM1) variants.
Results: Rare SCN5A variant prevalence differed between European (20.8%) and Japanese (8.9%) BrS patients (p = 5.7 × 10-18) and diagnosis with spontaneous (28.7%) versus induced (15.8%) Brugada type 1 electrocardiogram (ECG) (p = 1.3 × 10-13). Ion channel transmembrane regions and specific N-terminus (KCNH2) and C-terminus (KCNQ1/KCNH2) domains were characterized by high enrichment of case variants and >95% probability of pathogenicity. Applying the customized rules, 17.4% of European BrS and 74.8% of European LQTS cases had (likely) pathogenic variants, compared with estimated diagnostic yields (case excess over gnomAD) of 19.2%/82.1%, reducing VUS prevalence to close to background rare variant frequency.
Conclusion: Large case-control data sets enable quantitative implementation of ACMG/AMP guidelines and increased sensitivity for inherited arrhythmia genetic testing.
Keywords: ACMG/AMP guidelines; Brugada; LQTS; variant interpretation.
Similar articles
- Systematic re-evaluation of SCN5A variants associated with Brugada syndrome.J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2019 Jan;30(1):118-127. doi: 10.1111/jce.13740. Epub 2018 Oct 31.PMID: 30203441
- Genetic testing for long-QT syndrome: distinguishing pathogenic mutations from benign variants.Circulation. 2009 Nov 3;120(18):1752-60. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.863076. Epub 2009 Oct 19.PMID: 19841300 Free PMC article.
- Variant frequencies of KCNQ1, KCNH2, and SCN5A in a Chinese inherited arrhythmia cohort and other disease cohorts undergoing genetic testing.Ann Hum Genet. 2020 Mar;84(2):161-168. doi: 10.1111/ahg.12359. Epub 2019 Nov 7.PMID: 31696929
- Long QT Syndrome.2003 Feb 20 [updated 2018 Feb 8]. In: Adam MP, Ardinger HH, Pagon RA, Wallace SE, Bean LJH, Stephens K, Amemiya A, editors. GeneReviews® [Internet]. Seattle (WA): University of Washington, Seattle; 1993–2020.PMID: 20301308 Free Books & Documents. Review.
- Recent understanding of clinical sequencing and gene-based risk stratification in inherited primary arrhythmia syndrome.J Cardiol. 2019 May;73(5):335-342. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2019.01.009. Epub 2019 Mar 23.PMID: 30910390 Review.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario