Clinicopathologic features of breast cancer reclassified as HER2-amplified by fluorescence in situ hybridization with alternative chromosome 17 probes
Affiliations
- PMID: 32805517
- DOI: 10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2020.151576
Abstract
Objective: Dual probe fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assays for determination of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) gene amplification in breast cancer provide a ratio of HER2 to chromosome 17. The ratio may be skewed by copy number alterations (CNA) in the control locus for chromosome 17 (CEP17). We analyzed the impact of alternative chromosome 17 control probes on HER2 status in a series of breast cancers with an emphasis on patients reclassified as amplified.
Methods: Breast cancer patients with equivocal HER2 immunohistochemistry (2+) and equivocal FISH with CEP17 were included. Reclassification of HER2 status was assessed with alternative chromosome 17 control probes (LIS1 and RARA).
Results: A total of 40 unique patients with 46 specimens reflexed to alternative chromosome 17 probe testing were identified. The majority (>80%) of patients had pT1-2, hormone receptor-positive tumors with an intermediate or high combined histologic grade. There were 34/46 (73.9%) specimens reclassified as amplified with alternative probes, corresponding to 29/40 (72.5%) patients. Of the patients reclassified as amplified with alternative probes, 34.5% (10/29) received HER2-targeted therapy.
Conclusion: In this series, the majority of breast cancers tested with alternative chromosome 17 control probes under the 2013 ASCO/CAP Guidelines were converted to HER2-amplified. The treatment data and the clinicopathologic profile of the tumors suggest that most of these patients will neither receive nor benefit from HER2-targeted therapy. The findings support the recommendation in the 2018 ASCO/CAP HER2 Guidelines to discontinue the use of alternative chromosome 17 probes.
Keywords: ASCO/CAP guidelines; Breast; Chromosome 17; FISH; HER2.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest Dr. Anders receives research funding from PUMA, Lilly, Merck, Seattle Genetics, Nektar, Tesaro, G1-Therapeutics; compensation as a consultant for Genentech (1/2019-), Eisai (1/2019-), IPSEN (2/2019 -), Seattle Genetics (11/15/2019–11/15/2020); and royalties from UpToDate and Jones and Bartlett. Dr. Calhoun is a member of the Oncology Advisory Board for Luminex Corporation. The other authors have no relevant financial disclosures.
Similar articles
- Impact of an alternative chromosome 17 probe and the 2013 American Society of Clinical Oncology and College of American Pathologists guidelines on fluorescence in situ hybridization for the determination of HER2 gene amplification in breast cancer.Cancer. 2017 Jun 15;123(12):2230-2239. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30592. Epub 2017 Feb 13.PMID: 28192599
- Comparative Pathologic Analysis of Breast Cancers Classified as HER2/neu-Amplified by FISH Using a Standard HER2/CEP17 Dual Probe and an Alternative Chromosome 17 Control Probe.Am J Surg Pathol. 2018 Sep;42(9):1208-1215. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000001106.PMID: 29923906
- Assessment of ERBB2/HER2 Status in HER2-Equivocal Breast Cancers by FISH and 2013/2014 ASCO-CAP Guidelines.JAMA Oncol. 2019 Mar 1;5(3):366-375. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.6012.PMID: 30520947 Free PMC article.
- HER2 status in breast cancer: changes in guidelines and complicating factors for interpretation.J Pathol Transl Med. 2020 Jan;54(1):34-44. doi: 10.4132/jptm.2019.11.03. Epub 2019 Nov 6.PMID: 31693827 Free PMC article. Review.
- HER2 in situ hybridization in breast cancer: clinical implications of polysomy 17 and genetic heterogeneity.Mod Pathol. 2014 Jan;27(1):4-18. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2013.103. Epub 2013 Jun 28.PMID: 23807776 Review.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario